Information For:
  Astronomers
  Teachers & Students

Useful Links:
  Very Large Array (VLA)
  VLA Expansion Project (EVLA)
  Press Releases
  Image Gallery
  Frequently Asked Questions
  EPO newsletters
  Assistant Director's Page (VLA)

Proposal Selection: Refereeing and Observing Allocation

The refereeing and time-allocation process is summarized here; more details may be found here.

An e-mail acknowledgment is sent within a few days of a proposal's receipt, and the proposal is assigned a code such as BXnnn, where "B" designates the VLBA, "X" is the first letter of the proposer's last name, and "nnn" is a sequential number for investigators whose last names begin with "X" (e.g., BU012 is the 12th VLBA proposal received from proposers whose last names start with "U"). This code is used to identify a program throughout the observing process.

Each proposal is reviewed by several external referees who specialize in the particular scientific area of the proposal. NRAO compiles their reports and calculates grades, which are strongly advisory to the Proposal Selection Committee. That committee also incorporates knowledge about the technical capabilities of the VLBA, then uses the oversubscription of large additional telescopes and of the VLBA as a function of sidereal time to determine the final time allocation. Proposers receive e-mail notification of the results from this committee about three months after the proposal deadline.

If a proposal is accepted, the contact author receives e-mail notification of the specific time allocation and the deadline for schedule submission, and (for difficult observations) may be assigned an NRAO contact person in Socorro. For a dynamically scheduled proposal, a specific date will not be assigned, but a particular range of sidereal times will be specified.

Modified on Friday, 26-Sep-2008 12:16:56 MDT