From st2b102@hs.uni-hamburg.de Fri Feb 4 08:12:57 2005 Return-Path: Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 16:12:50 +0100 (CET) From: Dieter Engels Reply-To: dengels@hs.uni-hamburg.de To: Data Analysts Subject: Re: be026c In-Reply-To: <200502031832.LAA26915@aspen.aoc.nrao.edu> References: <200502031832.LAA26915@aspen.aoc.nrao.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hs.uni-hamburg.de X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact postmaster@aoc.nrao.edu for more information X-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-5.6, required 7, BAYES_01 -5.40, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION -0.50, FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0.64, FROM_HAS_MIXED_NUMS 0.06, IN_REP_TO -0.37, REFERENCES -0.00, REPLY_WITH_QUOTES 0.00, USER_AGENT_PINE 0.00) X-Lines: 30 On Thu, 3 Feb 2005, Data Analysts wrote: > Dear Dieter, > > As described in the observing log, there were > several stations that had bad weather > for this observation. HN: snow, OV: rain, NL: snow, > PT: out for PT-LINK, SC: rain. > > Since this is a high frequency project, these are > probably not ideal conditions for observing. Would > you like to reobserve this epoch without correlation? > Or would you prefer to proceed with this correlation > without reobservation? > > Regards, > Meri Stanley > NRAO Data Analyst > Dear Meri, I would prefer to reobserve this epoch without correlation. Regards, Dieter Engels ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dieter Engels e-mail: dengels@hs.uni-hamburg.de Hamburger Sternwarte Internet: http://www.hs.uni-hamburg.de Gojenbergsweg 112 D-21029 Hamburg Tel: 49-40-42891 4136 Germany Fax: 49-40-42891 4198 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------