From brunthal@mpifr-bonn.mpg.deThu Nov 29 09:18:34 2001
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 11:21:03 +0100
From: Andreas Brunthaler <brunthal@mpifr-bonn.mpg.de>
To: vlbiobs <vlbiobs@zia.aoc.NRAO.EDU>
Subject: BB142

Dear observers,

our proposal BB142 was accepted for dynamical scheduling with a high
priority preferably in October/November 2001, but no observation has
been made yet. Maybe our requirements on the weather conditions are too
tight and are never reached. To clarify our requirements I arrange the
antennas in three groups:

Group A: Mauna Kea, Hancock
Group B: Brewster, North Liberty, Fort Davis
Group C: All other antennas

For our observatiosn we defenetely need the antennas in Group A and at
least two antennas from group B with good weather conditions. Together
we would like to have at least 7 antennas with good weather conditions.


Regards,
Andreas Brunthaler


From brunthal@mpifr-bonn.mpg.de Mon Dec  3 13:43 MST 2001
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 21:43:51 +0100 (MET)
From: Andreas Brunthaler <brunthal@mpifr-bonn.mpg.de>
X-Sender: brunthal@hp177
To: analysts@zia.aoc.NRAO.EDU
cc: jwurnig@zia.aoc.NRAO.EDU
Subject: Re: Weather for BB142A and BB142B
In-Reply-To: <200112031618.JAA08613@agave.aoc.NRAO.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Lines: 30
Status: RO

Hello Jason,

I will look at the T-Sys plots and check how much data is lost. Then I 
will decide if we have to reobserve,
But there is another problem. In our proposal we asked for two epoch of 
each source (IC10 ,BB142A&B, and IC133, BB142C&D). But the two epochs for 
each source should have some time in between (min 3 days) so we get 
uncorrelated atmospheres for the two observations. Now the first two 
observations of IC10 were done within 2 days. Please make sure that for 
BB142C & D there are at least 3 days in between.

Best regards,
Andreas