Return-Path: Received: from io.gb.nrao.edu (io.gb.nrao.edu [192.33.116.9]) by dropbox.aoc.nrao.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1/smtp-gateway) with ESMTP id jBDJY83C031628; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 12:34:09 -0700 Received: from webmail.nrao.edu (leo.gb.nrao.edu [192.33.116.10]) by io.gb.nrao.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jBDJXx9V032576; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 14:33:59 -0500 Received: from 192.33.116.167 (SquirrelMail authenticated user tminter) by webmail.gb.nrao.edu with HTTP; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 14:33:59 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <33099.192.33.116.167.1134502439.squirrel@webmail.gb.nrao.edu> Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 14:33:59 -0500 (EST) Subject: VLBI run BB184 in Green Bank From: "Toney Minter" To: gbtlocal@nrao.edu, gbtops@nrao.edu, analysts@aoc.nrao.edu, vlbaops@aoc.nrao.edu Cc: jbraatz@nrao.edu Reply-To: tminter@nrao.edu User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal References: In-Reply-To: X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact postmaster@gb.nrao.edu for more information X-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-101.44, required 5, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.44, USER_IN_WHITELIST -100.00) X-MailScanner-From: tminter@nrao.edu We were late getting the GBT observing going due to several reasons. We had to do emergency changes to a receiver's cyrogenics which took a little longer than planned. We also had to do some follow-up checks of the GBT pointing to make sure that we could participate in the observations due to snow and ice on the dish surface and on the sub-reflector. We started observing at about 12:16 UT. During the whole observing run it was snowing in Green Bank. There was significant snow and ice build-up on the surface of the dish (5-6 inches [13-15 cm] is reported in some places on the surface during maintenance the day after the observations). The Tsys values were typically between 50 and 60 K during the run. The apperature efficiency was down from the expected 70% to values in the 50-55% range - via back of the envelope calculations and assuming that the pointing source flux was correct. The data from the GBT should be treated with some caution due to the observing conditions. Toney Minter