From vlbiobs@nrao.eduWed Jul 10 10:54:58 2002
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 11:35:05 -0600 (MDT)
From: "VLBI Observers (Aspen only)" <vlbiobs@nrao.edu>
To: Shami Chatterjee <shami@astro.cornell.edu>
Cc: Data Analysts <analysts@zia.aoc.NRAO.EDU>,
    Walter Brisken <wbrisken@zia.aoc.NRAO.EDU>,
    David Medcalf <dmedcalf@nrao.edu>
Subject: Re: BC123 revised setup


Hi Shami,

I've replaced your setup files for all remaining epochs of
bc123, starting with bc123e and running through bc123ai.
I have re-ran sched on the first few and they look fine. 

cheers,

Lisa Foley

 

On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Shami Chatterjee wrote:

> Hi,
> A few segments of BC123 have now been observed, and we are seeing
> persistent RFI at SC, IFs 3 and 4 (between 1485 and 1493 MHz).
> 
> As such, we would like to replace the setup, so that IFs 3,4 are between
> 1504--1512 MHz. I attach a revised setup file, with the same name (so it
> will work with all current key files).  It is identified as VERSION 2 in
> the header comments. This should be used for all future segments of BC123.
> 
> Thanks, and I hope this is not too much trouble.
> -Shami
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>  Shami Chatterjee     http://www.astro.cornell.edu/~shami/
> 
>  Hofstadter's Law: Everything takes longer than you expect,
>            even when you take into account Hofstadters law.
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>