Message-ID: <442C42F6.6040800@aoc.nrao.edu> Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 13:43:34 -0700 From: Data Analysts User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.4.1 (X11/20050929) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Boboltz Subject: Re: BB220 References: <20060329161146.GA3219@sting.aoc.nrao.edu> <31C41496-62B1-46AF-A292-6B3ABA7DB7E3@usno.navy.mil> In-Reply-To: <31C41496-62B1-46AF-A292-6B3ABA7DB7E3@usno.navy.mil> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Dave, We are giving you a re-obs. We'll call it BB220B. I've copied the files from BB220 into a new project directory. We will abandon BB220 without correlation. Best, Meri David Boboltz wrote: > > Hi Paul et al. > > I did notice that I there were only 8 antennas when I received the > observe log, which is why I mentioned it to Joan hoping she might > offer a re-observation. I was disappointed that it was two of the > better antennas KP and PT. > > Unfortunately, the VLTI observations were unsuccessful, and the > time constraint no longer applies. I would take a re-observe if you > gave it to me, but I don't want to press for it. > > Dave > > > On Mar 29, 2006, at 11:11 AM, Paul Dyer wrote: > >> Hi Dave: >> >> I have begun to prepare correlator job scripts for this project. I >> noticed that you requested a minimum of nine antennas. Unfortunately >> PT was engaged in a VLA/PT-link project and KP lost commercial power >> shortly before your project started and power was not restored until >> after the end of your project, leaving only eight antennas in the >> array. >> I also noticed that you had time constraints as to the obs date. The >> options are: you could petition for a re-observation or accept the >> original >> data. Only one observation will be correlated. Please let me know your >> preference. >> >> -- >> Paul Dyer NRAO Data Analyst >> pdyer@nrao.edu >